The Best and Worst Small Cities for Tech Job Seekers

Cities For Tech Job Seekers
Lynn Cadet

Writer: Lynn Cadet

Lynn Cadet

Lynn Cadet, Contributing Expert

Lynn Cadet is a seasoned technology writer with extensive experience covering web hosting, software platforms, and IT infrastructure. At HostingAdvice.com, she has authored more than 300 articles analyzing everything from server architecture and cloud performance to cybersecurity, SaaS innovations, and developer-driven tools. She also conducts hands-on testing of web hosts, evaluating performance, usability, and reliability, to produce thorough, data-driven reviews. A graduate of the University of Florida, Lynn’s reporting and editorial work can also be found across multiple online publications.

See Full Bio »
Close
Lillian Castro

Editor: Lillian Castro

Lillian Castro

Lillian Castro, Senior Editor

Lillian Castro brings more than 30 years of editing and journalism experience to our team. She has written and edited for major news organizations, including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the New York Times, and she previously served as an adjunct instructor at the University of Florida. Today, she edits HostingAdvice content for clarity, accuracy, and reader engagement.

See Full Bio »
Close
Cristian Lopez

Reviewer: Cristian Lopez

Cristian Lopez

Cristian Lopez, News Manager

Cristian Lopez uses his Business Marketing background from the University of Illinois at Chicago to create comfortable environments for customers, clients, and colleagues to share their thoughts and ideas openly. From interviewing tech leaders to conducting UX market research projects, Cristian knows the importance of storytelling — a key variable for innovation and inspiration. His goal at HostingAdvice is to wow readers on the ever-evolving nature of the tech industry and bring his audience the most reliable and exciting content on all things hosting.

See Full Bio »
Close
Updated:
The HostingAdvice team of research and technology experts conducts our studies through nationwide surveys and in-depth data analysis.
Follow Us:
2.7k
1k
16k
5.7k
134
3.5k

Key Takeaways

The tech industry has seen major job-market shakeups in the last few years, with mass layoffs rocking top companies, including Meta and Amazon. Yet despite the instability in Silicon Valley, tech job seekers aren’t without prospects or opportunity elsewhere.

As the tech market continues to evolve and expand beyond major hubs like San Francisco and Seattle, smaller cities are emerging as viable destinations for tech job seekers. In fact, these cities offer both active, diverse job markets and a stable cost of living, making them suitable for IT workers of various backgrounds.

To identify the best small cities for tech workers, HostingAdvice.com examined city-level differences in key metrics, including economic opportunities, job market dynamics, cost of living, digital connectivity, and quality of life, across 386 U.S. cities with a population of less than 100,000.

Based on a weighted 100-point scoring system, here are the best and worst small cities for tech job seekers in 2026.

Best and Worst Small Cities for Tech Job Seekers

Main Findings

The table below ranks each small city across five key dimensions: Economic Opportunities, Job Market Dynamics, Cost of Living, Digital Connectivity, and Quality of Life.

Rank City State Total Score Economic Opportunities Job Market Dynamics Cost of Living Digital Connectivity Quality of Life
1 Silver Spring MD 64.93 21.35 93.64 58.04 99.71 78.01
2 Morristown NJ 63.92 23.17 90.54 53.19 100 81.26
3 Des Plaines IL 62.19 42.03 75.58 59.05 100 53.47
4 Charlottesville VA 61.56 10.37 81.82 64.59 100 82.42
5 Longmont CO 61.45 20.45 82.96 65.96 99.95 60.75
6 West Hollywood CA 61.19 62.84 87.03 20.62 99.99 57.14
7 Marietta GA 60.94 16.22 84.79 57.67 100 75.15
8 Stanford CA 60.71 71.78 75.63 33.91 100 35.85
9 Ames IA 60.71 6.92 82.63 64.33 100 81.57
10 Grapevine TX 60.1 19.37 88.6 56.64 100 59.64
11 Somerville NJ 60 23.94 88.2 37.38 100 84.15
12 Logan UT 59.66 4.72 90.53 58.56 100 74.72
13 Fayetteville AR 59.58 7.2 79.83 63.56 100 79.59
14 Waukesha WI 59.54 12 88.37 54.84 100 71.58
15 Fairfax VA 59.24 8.17 87.73 59.49 100 69.28
16 Crystal Lake IL 59.06 5.96 83.65 60.02 99.95 77.69
17 Rogers AR 59.05 15.19 84.5 62.36 99.54 57.21
18 Appleton WI 58.84 8.24 85.69 60.73 99.92 67.9
19 Satellite Beach FL 58.75 11.26 75.25 58.71 100 83
20 Frederick MD 58.55 9.82 85.95 54.23 99.88 73.79
21 Royal Oak MI 58.47 19.39 88.89 47.38 99.88 63.8
22 Verona WI 58.34 13.92 91.47 57.85 99.9 50.26
23 Eau Claire WI 58.03 6.46 85.75 52.49 99.86 79.13
24 Bend OR 57.96 9.15 77.5 55.2 100 83.33
25 Ogden UT 57.81 7.16 83.4 59.18 100 69.13
26 Lawrence KS 57.71 4.15 85.32 58.38 99.88 71.76
27 Johnson City TN 57.62 5.03 79.31 66.07 98.26 67.94
28 Arcadia CA 57.62 62.84 66.94 36.22 99.99 40.83
29 Fredericksburg VA 57.61 6.58 82.99 56.47 100 74.01
30 Jupiter FL 57.44 18.69 70.71 59.16 100 68.69
31 Cheyenne WY 57.23 6.27 79.91 60.18 100 70.93
32 Boone IA 57.23 4.66 83.5 61.01 100 66.24
33 Wausau WI 57.03 6.9 81.5 54.32 99.9 75.74
34 Jacksonville NC 56.99 2.06 91.98 53.49 100 67.39
35 Lancaster PA 56.45 8.54 85.58 48.09 99.88 72.71
36 Lawrenceville GA 56.35 12.34 83.54 49.24 99.42 67.48
37 White Plains NY 56.3 22.44 81.74 54.71 100 43.87
38 Bloomington IN 56.26 5.65 76.32 57.68 100 75.67
39 Somerset NJ 56.18 23.94 85.92 38.97 100 59.83
40 San Angelo TX 56.16 5.83 80.71 57.14 100 68.3
41 Seminole FL 55.96 12.77 66.1 54.49 99.92 84.17
42 Sioux City IA 55.94 5.24 81.99 56.84 100 66.17
43 Smyrna GA 55.79 16.22 93.21 52.78 100 34.91
44 Bowling Green KY 55.78 6.04 78.96 59.81 100 63.83
45 Mankato MN 55.78 5.6 82.64 61.61 100 55.49
46 Dalton GA 55.78 5.54 77.83 54.88 100 74.75
47 Chapel Hill NC 55.74 10.54 72.49 59.12 99.48 68.34
48 Danbury CT 55.72 32.52 81.87 30.63 100 63.1
49 Edmond OK 55.57 11.73 79.41 64.4 99.98 44.6
50 Bremerton WA 55.54 7.78 81.47 57.97 99.72 58.4
51 Fond Du Lac WI 55.51 6.54 79.77 51.93 100 72.97
52 Moline IL 55.49 11.14 73.14 60.29 100 62.33
53 Traverse City MI 55.34 6.82 75.94 52.38 99.87 77.13
54 Kenosha WI 55.33 6.77 82.65 55.44 99.91 60.82
55 Asheville NC 55.33 6.92 75.87 58.68 98.74 67.25
56 Lexington MA 55.33 35.53 76.12 38.62 97.12 53.62
57 Sarasota FL 55.32 9.85 61.92 60.59 100 81.55
58 Lockport IL 55.2 9.25 83.68 60.35 100 45.86
59 Harrisonburg VA 55.18 2.89 76.08 60.15 100 69.3
60 Roanoke VA 55.12 7.94 75.7 55.89 100 68.22
61 Lafayette IN 55.12 6.6 83.19 57.78 100 54.84
62 Biloxi MS 55.1 2.57 80.93 62.23 100 57.76
63 Lake Charles LA 55.09 8.52 73.15 61.56 99.6 62.13
64 Owensboro KY 55.04 5.17 73.56 61.01 100 67.4
65 West Hartford CT 55.01 19.07 77.75 40.65 100 70.96
66 Fort Walton Beach FL 55.01 7.19 77.18 56.24 99.94 65.74
67 Cherry Hill NJ 55 10.71 79.14 43.83 100 77.19
68 Carson City NV 54.97 8.25 70.81 62.58 100 63.76
69 St. Augustine FL 54.97 7.65 65.12 60.38 100 77.85
70 Grand Junction CO 54.86 5.95 73.37 62.67 100 62.45
71 Lexington Park MD 54.84 11.72 90.23 47.1 100 50.54
72 Dekalb IL 54.82 5.82 78.2 54.33 100 68.18
73 Waterloo IA 54.81 7.15 78.63 55.73 100 62.85
74 Victoria TX 54.65 5.87 75.5 55.37 100 69.78
75 Harrisburg PA 54.5 10.26 77.78 50.63 100 65.57
76 Auburn AL 54.45 3.49 77.79 57.64 99.92 64.88
77 Noblesville IN 54.32 13.21 91.77 58.2 99.91 23.55
78 Jackson TN 54.23 5.9 75.42 60.54 100 58.46
79 Henderson KY 54.14 5.76 68.5 62.29 100 66.7
80 Safety Harbor FL 54.1 12.77 73.26 57.34 99.92 55.06
81 Greenville NC 54.04 5.68 77.03 52.74 100 67.88
82 Fort Lee NJ 54.03 18.18 76.2 37.7 100 73.38
83 Champaign IL 53.94 7.68 70.76 52.94 100 73.96
84 Oshkosh WI 53.89 8.84 80.24 52.18 100 57.19
85 Decatur GA 53.88 14.44 82.47 56.39 100 37.05
86 Fort Smith AR 53.85 5.78 72.99 62.33 100 57.17
87 Livonia MI 53.83 18.07 69.99 47.14 100 66.87
88 Lawton OK 53.73 3.38 72.08 60.48 100 64.96
89 Melbourne FL 53.73 11.26 68.66 58.38 100 61.07
90 Kalamazoo MI 53.72 9.27 77.27 46.84 99.78 69.28
91 Wendell NC 53.68 18.49 90.12 56.11 100 16.66
92 Blacksburg VA 53.49 4.9 63.47 57.24 96.49 82.96
93 Florence AL 53.47 2.49 75.49 53.74 100 70.27
94 Thiensville WI 53.45 6.85 84.4 54.75 99.67 46.55
95 Dothan AL 53.4 4.73 74.02 54.81 100 66.75
96 Gainesville GA 53.3 9.09 77.51 56.73 99.92 49.82
97 Richfield WI 53.3 6.81 85.82 59.19 100 35.62
98 Charleston WV 53.21 8.39 69.44 51.95 99.65 71.99
99 Elkhart IN 53.1 8.58 81.31 55.7 100 44.71
100 Jonesboro AR 53.06 4.55 73.77 59.56 100 57.27
101 Urbana IL 53.05 7.68 69.5 50.71 100 73.83
102 La Crosse WI 53.03 6.78 80.76 56.37 100 47
103 Woodstock GA 53.03 5.52 90.68 53.09 100 38.04
104 Belleville IL 53.02 6.02 74.3 66.56 100 41.99
105 Salisbury MD 53.01 6.02 77.36 49.39 100 65.43
106 Naples FL 52.97 10.74 43.11 67.93 100 83.53
107 Kingsport TN 52.94 8.15 69.33 63.62 100 51.13
108 Winchester VA 52.92 6.79 79.8 52.8 100 53.82
109 Cranford NJ 52.89 16.71 77.34 35.15 100 70.61
110 Valdosta GA 52.75 2.85 71.69 55.59 100 68.13
111 Kokomo IN 52.67 8.32 68.68 53.78 99.83 66.61
112 Glenside PA 52.56 20.88 83.96 43.65 100 36.24
113 Joplin MO 52.53 4.28 74.85 53.68 99.54 62.49
114 Temple TX 52.48 8.45 74.35 59.88 99.96 45.41
115 Greenfield IN 52.45 6.12 84.58 55.63 100 39.08
116 Morgantown WV 52.44 8.44 72.47 49.6 99.74 65.61
117 Bellevue NE 52.33 12.65 82.99 64.2 100 15.78
118 Oak Ridge TN 52.22 13.39 75.67 62.69 100 28.53
119 Hattiesburg MS 52.07 4.16 80.38 57.75 98.11 44.62
120 Dedham MA 52.06 17.81 83.06 28.57 100 64.66
121 Jenkintown PA 51.95 20.88 81.15 44.48 100 35.48
122 Lynchburg VA 51.94 6.4 69.76 53.24 100 63.92
123 Boonton NJ 51.94 23.17 85.84 38.35 100 34.03
124 Fort Myers FL 51.89 9.28 65.32 60.99 99.99 53.3
125 Spartanburg SC 51.87 7.35 66.96 52.41 99.74 68.1
126 Pensacola FL 51.84 7.98 72.19 56.71 99.83 50.88
127 Albany NY 51.83 12.92 78.3 35.99 99.96 66.9
128 Hagerstown MD 51.63 6.15 72.76 48.67 99.8 65.05
129 Reading PA 51.62 8.99 75.28 46.5 99.92 59.57
130 Trenton NJ 51.62 19.41 72.81 40.22 100 56.72
131 Coral Gables FL 51.6 24.71 75.89 55.4 100 17.29
132 St. Charles IL 51.6 8.93 78.95 60.56 99.86 30.02
133 West Lafayette IN 51.59 6.6 66.16 51.84 100 69.62
134 Mount Pleasant SC 51.52 11.27 78.68 59.15 99.88 28.41
135 Needham MA 51.52 17.81 80.44 36.41 100 52.38
136 Woodbridge VA 51.49 6.57 90.29 47.86 100 35.39
137 Santa Cruz CA 51.46 8.95 66.43 45.32 100 75.27
138 York PA 51.36 8.55 80.52 42.53 99.65 56.62
139 Melrose MA 51.35 35.53 81.43 29.03 97.12 34.25
140 Terre Haute IN 51.29 4.84 69.39 52.5 100 64.07
141 Whittier CA 51.22 62.84 71.43 20.64 99.99 16.6
142 Red Bank NJ 51.22 12.28 85.33 36.8 100 50.81
143 Southfield MI 51.21 19.39 74.76 44.35 99.88 43.95
144 Waynesboro VA 51.2 3.35 80.24 52.54 100 47.8
145 Cape Girardeau MO 51.16 4.67 76.9 54.14 98.93 48.92
146 Poughkeepsie NY 51.15 9.7 80.61 38.02 100 60.42
147 Hudson MA 51.13 35.53 79.04 25.04 97.12 43.4
148 Merrillville IN 51.12 8.94 72.96 56.27 100 43.83
149 Canton OH 51.08 6.17 70.32 51.84 99.84 60.1
150 Severn MD 50.93 15.57 88.03 48.79 98.82 19.66
151 Ithaca NY 50.91 10.03 66.21 37.51 99.72 83.34
152 Conway AR 50.83 3.84 76.23 60.42 99.88 38.11
153 Kingston TN 50.83 15.13 66.15 62.63 99.23 32.86
154 Jefferson City MO 50.81 5.71 77.01 55.18 100 42.2
155 Ocala FL 50.8 5.19 62.86 58.07 99.83 61.93
156 Santa Barbara CA 50.77 10.9 74.39 38.2 100 65.98
157 Plymouth MA 50.72 10.97 80.22 24.23 100 79.08
158 Highland Park NJ 50.67 17.45 86.81 37.47 100 34.92
159 Little Chute WI 50.67 8.24 87.51 54.52 99.92 20.74
160 Erie PA 50.64 5.13 69.39 48.87 98.95 65.96
161 Longview TX 50.64 6.9 72.48 55.94 100 45.39
162 Greer SC 50.58 10.31 81.85 55 99.97 25.27
163 Fort Mill SC 50.54 8.25 79.22 58.39 99.84 27.23
164 Romeoville IL 50.53 9.25 85.11 59.83 100 13.23
165 Janesville WI 50.38 7.21 79.12 53.34 99.82 36.51
166 Whitehouse TX 50.31 6.42 84.15 59.54 99.75 18.7
167 Bethlehem PA 50.26 7.74 74.28 54.18 100 41.39
168 State College PA 50.23 5.73 60.85 41 99.62 89.18
169 Bayside WI 50.14 13.35 73.03 60.67 100 22.54
170 Mechanicsville MD 50.14 11.72 84.91 49.5 100 24.07
171 Iowa City IA 50.1 5.06 86.51 58.8 0 83.4
172 St. Cloud MN 50.01 7.7 78.17 54 100 33.64
173 Columbia TN 49.92 8.05 74.26 61.86 100 25.85
174 Pottstown PA 49.83 20.88 80.67 39.9 100 29.77
175 Haysville KS 49.73 9.02 73.86 53.79 100 37.09
176 Myrtle Beach SC 49.66 3.64 63.08 57.81 100 56.88
177 Taylors SC 49.62 10.31 80.32 54.5 99.97 22.24
178 Anderson IN 49.59 3.88 72.1 52.95 100 49.05
179 Woodway TX 49.56 7.66 75.73 61.97 100 21.44
180 Owings Mills MD 49.55 12.91 89.35 45.28 99.96 17.81
181 Lima OH 49.43 6.84 68.5 53.46 100 48.19
182 Alton IL 49.37 6.66 73.45 62.06 99.94 25.53
183 De Pere WI 49.37 9.07 83.54 54.55 99.89 17.29
184 Neptune City NJ 49.34 12.28 91.98 36.01 100 28.48
185 South El Monte CA 49.33 62.84 69.09 18.41 99.99 11.63
186 Ashland KY 49.25 6.97 65.96 52.72 100 52.27
187 Rochester Hills MI 49.21 19.39 77.56 49.18 99.88 17.92
188 Muncie IN 49.21 4.11 72.87 52.69 100 45.29
189 Camarillo CA 49.16 12.45 72.07 25.02 100 78.47
190 Willoughby OH 49.13 7.15 78.21 50.28 100 34.78
191 Munster IN 49.13 8.94 73.85 60.18 100 22.58
192 Staunton VA 49.1 1.97 75.31 53.05 100 43.44
193 Hinesville GA 49 3.54 80.57 53.91 100 29.98
194 Decatur IL 48.83 10.09 61.4 50.96 100 54.77
195 Avon OH 48.76 5.71 81.91 56.21 99.81 18.81
196 Leavenworth KS 48.75 4.09 67.78 53.98 99.79 48.76
197 Parsippany NJ 48.74 23.17 81.49 36.98 100 22.21
198 Superior WI 48.71 4.55 74.33 58.3 100 29.4
199 Denham Springs LA 48.7 2.96 75.11 62.97 100 22.95
200 Monroe MI 48.38 7.51 65.3 50.39 99.91 50.59
201 Rock Island IL 48.3 11.14 66.7 52.23 100 38.55
202 East Lansing MI 48.25 9.02 64.42 48.16 99.84 52.41
203 Monroeville PA 48.24 18.78 76.09 45 99.99 21.78
204 Magnolia NJ 48.13 10.71 81.93 43.54 100 27.22
205 Culpeper VA 48.05 5.53 84.86 46.94 94.74 28.27
206 Frisco CO 48.05 5.27 86.44 13.67 100 78.05
207 San Luis Obispo CA 48.02 7.28 74.87 28.08 100 69.77
208 North Augusta SC 48.02 8.42 76.07 54.96 100 21.07
209 Kingston NY 48.02 5.49 78.79 37.74 99.15 50.68
210 Taunton MA 47.76 9.44 75.19 31.23 100 58.65
211 Hot Springs AR 47.74 2.43 64.93 59.22 100 40.61
212 Attleboro MA 47.7 9.44 79.78 25.8 100 59.64
213 Melville NY 47.67 18.26 74.35 42.54 100 25.88
214 Daytona Beach FL 47.63 6.2 58.77 55.43 100 50.21
215 Geneva NY 47.61 8.29 73.42 31.98 100 61.27
216 Walnut Creek CA 47.57 19.09 70.32 16.53 100 73.88
217 Binghamton NY 47.56 6.6 67.63 37.69 100 63.86
218 Harlingen TX 47.54 2.11 61.33 56.23 100 50.85
219 Suffolk VA 47.53 7.8 79.45 55.51 100 12.28
220 Paramus NJ 47.48 18.18 73.69 41.11 100 28.25
221 Ripon WI 47.46 6.54 76.43 51.24 100 26.03
222 Bryan TX 47.43 5.58 79.31 55.09 100 16.24
223 Newton IA 47.43 3.62 75.98 54.86 100 25.46
224 Texarkana AR 47.4 4.06 61.53 56.48 100 45.85
225 Aiken SC 47.32 8.42 61.65 54.1 100 41.83
226 Haverhill MA 47.29 14.22 79.29 24.84 100 51.33
227 Schenectady NY 47.28 11.11 74.06 29.62 100 57.23
228 Gadsden AL 47.27 2.75 67.6 52.17 100 44.28
229 Pontiac MI 47.25 19.39 74.46 42.17 99.88 21.75
230 Wheeling WV 47.22 5.88 65.76 48.74 99.7 47.67
231 Corydon KY 46.96 5.76 74.72 59.64 100 12.87
232 St. George UT 46.92 3.66 72.27 60.1 100 19.44
233 East Peoria IL 46.91 6.28 74.49 53.12 99.89 22.97
234 Provincetown MA 46.91 8.43 75.9 26.3 100 61.7
235 Towson MD 46.89 12.91 75.62 45.75 99.96 22.17
236 Point Pleasant Beach NJ 46.83 6.78 80.32 40.86 100 32.26
237 Southgate MI 46.79 18.07 69.09 44.17 100 26.35
238 Bossier City LA 46.61 4.26 76.12 60.83 99.54 9.03
239 Panama City Beach FL 46.59 4.79 77.22 55.19 99.88 15.36
240 Clarks Summit PA 46.42 5.14 76.16 46.78 99.81 29.48
241 Youngstown OH 46.38 4.54 55.3 51.27 99.82 57.51
242 Brunswick GA 46.31 4.18 66.58 51.88 100 37.67
243 New Brunswick NJ 46.1 17.45 78.28 33.9 100 24.65
244 Johnstown PA 46.07 3.68 61.89 40.61 99.9 63.54
245 West Monroe LA 46.06 4.11 70.56 60.41 99.91 15.35
246 Linwood NJ 46.04 6.32 72.62 51.32 99.85 23.29
247 Bluffton SC 46 5.01 70.72 57.98 100 17.17
248 Ocean Ridge FL 45.89 18.69 58.23 54.9 100 19.54
249 Bonita Springs FL 45.87 9.28 51.63 57.11 99.99 42.43
250 Forsyth GA 45.87 5.11 73 53.77 100 19.31
251 St. Joseph MO 45.81 6.92 72.86 52.98 100 17.47
252 Manchester CT 45.79 19.07 81.5 25.55 100 28.41
253 Machesney Park IL 45.77 7.41 69.12 54.03 100 20.84
254 Atlantic City NJ 45.65 6.32 67.2 40.73 99.85 47.38
255 Pembroke Park FL 45.59 18.53 68.31 47.94 100 12.63
256 Monroe LA 45.58 4.11 65.94 59.6 99.91 21.21
257 Yuma AZ 45.51 4.52 51.45 57.23 100 48.05
258 Saginaw MI 45.41 6.5 58.82 47.33 99.63 48.53
259 Albany GA 45.36 4.85 64.07 52 100 34.19
260 Utica NY 45.34 6.16 69 35.48 99.81 51.32
261 Aspen CO 45.32 11.91 90.56 3.85 100 58.3
262 Butler PA 45.28 8.88 73.7 41.79 99.41 28.32
263 Clemson SC 45.26 2.9 65.26 51.96 99.79 35.01
264 Middletown NY 45.25 7.38 77.65 30.16 100 43.05
265 Rome GA 45.13 3.81 72.21 53.52 100 18.27
266 Belton TX 45.05 8.45 66.99 56.69 99.96 13.47
267 Weslaco TX 45.03 1.98 64.13 56.76 100 28.78
268 Elmira NY 45.03 6.4 64.46 29.48 100 66.32
269 Salem MA 45.02 14.22 81.01 24.55 100 33.84
270 Mansfield OH 44.97 3.83 56.11 51.02 99.77 48.35
271 Portsmouth VA 44.91 5.85 75.15 52.55 100 10.13
272 Watertown NY 44.8 4.72 72.87 33.14 99.78 47.6
273 Davis CA 44.73 9.5 66.81 23.71 100 64.86
274 Villanova PA 44.59 12.78 55.54 57.26 100 21.3
275 Moosic PA 44.5 5.14 78.35 45.69 99.81 14.82
276 Elko NV 44.42 8.09 82.89 4.31 100 70.66
277 Quincy IL 44.38 5.74 78.85 9.17 100 72.98
278 Bristol VA 44.31 2.18 69.22 58.62 100 12.03
279 Palm Springs CA 44.29 12.02 59.03 29.08 99.99 61.74
280 Atlantic Highlands NJ 44.28 12.28 73.98 39.43 100 19.08
281 Wilkes-barre PA 44.2 6.1 67.75 42.78 99.96 33.65
282 Monterey CA 44.18 7.45 62.43 26.85 99.96 66.72
283 Flint MI 44.14 6.22 52.72 46.63 100 51.67
284 Altoona PA 43.91 4.76 72.71 42.45 99.77 26.35
285 Newburgh NY 43.81 7.38 73.61 28.1 100 43.57
286 Petersburg VA 43.67 4.46 71.35 51.84 100 11.72
287 Montclair NJ 43.66 8.4 52.25 30.8 100 71.96
288 Oxford OH 43.64 9.47 57.74 50.04 100 28.88
289 Glastonbury CT 43.63 19.07 73.62 28.59 100 22.08
290 Redding CA 43.61 6.1 66.27 26.92 99.92 58.62
291 Steubenville OH 43.56 4.42 62.57 48.65 99.81 31.14
292 Pittsfield MA 43.08 7.71 73 20.69 100 51.53
293 Bristol CT 43.05 11.86 76.85 24.61 100 31.49
294 Dodge City KS 42.92 4.87 89.56 3.36 100 56.48
295 Meriden CT 42.75 13.64 74.71 25.28 100 28.94
296 Newton NJ 42.68 6.17 74.03 34.85 100 26.08
297 Hilton Head SC 42.55 5.01 58.84 56.45 100 16.47
298 Hays KS 42.42 2.98 89.05 2.42 100 58.7
299 Woodland Park NJ 42.31 8.4 72.3 36.93 100 19.37
300 Westfield MA 42.07 8.68 68.44 21.61 100 49.26
301 Palmer MA 41.87 8.68 69.35 20.75 100 47.82
302 Sturbridge MA 41.71 13.03 78.01 25.52 98.1 18.4
303 Park City UT 41.62 9.11 85.36 9.31 100 37.85
304 Anniston AL 41.46 3.61 66.02 52.54 100 6.12
305 Glenwood Springs CO 41.45 8.33 92.87 5.45 100 31.93
306 Auburn IN 41.39 8.19 86.68 3.36 100 45.54
307 Salina KS 41.28 4.17 82.18 2.72 100 60.11
308 New Bern NC 41.23 4.08 73.03 8.7 100 65.18
309 Northampton MA 41.08 6.42 73.97 20.54 100 39.01
310 Moraga CA 41.04 19.09 68.96 24.4 100 19.49
311 Plattsburgh NY 41.03 4.58 73.08 9.68 100 61.3
312 Tupelo MS 40.71 4.54 78.59 3.13 100 60.97
313 Fall River MA 40.17 9.44 69.18 21.92 100 33.59
314 Macedon NY 40.01 5.73 70.25 31.77 100 20.48
315 Stillwater OK 39.82 2.04 71.67 5.78 100 66.32
316 Crested Butte CO 39.72 3.93 92.25 3.89 100 31.35
317 Alexandria MN 39.61 5.69 73.6 2.68 100 60.77
318 Hollister CA 39.39 5.39 72.49 22.97 100 27.88
319 Stevens Point WI 39.19 6.14 85.94 2.38 100 37.2
320 Frankfort KY 39.08 6.38 78.32 1.92 100 49.49
321 Mason City IA 39 5.46 78.39 3 100 48.61
322 Starkville MS 38.5 0.29 77.47 0.92 100 58.86
323 Statesboro GA 38.25 2.26 70.06 1.16 100 65.84
324 Storm Lake IA 37.74 4.97 88.3 2.81 100 24.81
325 Steamboat Springs CO 37.66 6.48 86.99 6.69 98.65 18.4
326 Wisconsin Rapids WI 37.49 6.11 75.42 2.12 100 43.83
327 Sylva NC 37.11 2.52 81.72 1.1 99.79 38.62
328 Athens OH 37.03 2.13 67.86 0.56 98.17 63.82
329 Garden City KS 36.86 4.57 86.07 3.74 100 21.76
330 Roseburg OR 36.86 4.35 56.6 4.48 100 70.03
331 Gardnerville NV 36.85 9.68 56.37 2.77 100 64.33
332 Chicopee MA 36.61 8.68 67.37 19.3 100 18.51
333 Punta Gorda FL 36.58 5.06 36.97 56.01 100 13.78
334 Marquette MI 36.45 4.83 69.53 2.16 100 48.77
335 Tahlequah OK 35.93 0.1 77.29 1.6 100 41.22
336 Ottawa IL 35.87 6.78 65.64 11.19 100 33.08
337 Morehead City NC 35.6 1.92 73.67 2.21 100 40.99
338 London KY 35.16 3.38 54.53 1.42 100 68.83
339 Ukiah CA 35.15 4.48 65 3.12 100 46.66
340 Ada OK 34.91 3.51 78.12 5.58 99.31 21.17
341 Owatonna MN 34.77 7.39 72.11 4.46 100 25.16
342 Carterville IL 34.59 4.1 77.65 2.77 100 23.06
343 Strasburg VA 34.54 3.95 79.72 2.78 100 19.51
344 Russellville AR 34.49 4.09 67.57 1.72 99.07 41.58
345 Carbondale IL 34.35 5.04 63.26 0 98.22 49.7
346 Manitowoc WI 34.03 5.02 76 2.9 100 20.3
347 Waynesville NC 33.61 2.47 72.76 2.09 99.06 29.2
348 Marion KS 33.61 1.95 77.38 2.41 100 21.15
349 Bemidji MN 33.6 3.95 68.96 2.14 100 32.27
350 Hannibal MO 33.16 4.17 66.38 1.98 100 33.52
351 Newland NC 33.03 1.53 76.57 1.27 100 21.25
352 Eureka CA 32.76 4.65 68.42 2.34 48.69 60.23
353 Woods Hole MA 32.75 8.43 48.53 18.37 100 26.09
354 New Castle IN 32.53 2.65 73.07 1.79 99.38 21.41
355 Shawnee OK 32.4 2.99 67.37 2.17 98.79 29.23
356 Ponca City OK 32.29 4.34 71.98 2.19 100 17.75
357 Bucyrus OH 32.29 3.68 69.51 2.04 99.02 23.87
358 Cadillac MI 32.18 4.09 62.97 1.8 99.25 33.62
359 Fergus Falls MN 31.82 4.22 64.51 2.21 100 27.25
360 Negaunee MI 31.78 4.83 69.37 3.53 100 15.64
361 Seneca SC 31.72 6.64 71.4 1.83 100 11.69
362 Pahrump NV 31.54 9.72 44.06 7.28 100 41.86
363 Bluefield VA 31.41 2.37 58.51 2.01 100 37.92
364 East Moline IL 31.16 11.14 64.04 2.72 100 11.23
365 Sturgeon Bay WI 31.08 2.49 74.01 2.55 92.53 13.79
366 Ishpeming MI 31.01 4.83 70.27 1.89 100 11.72
367 Rhinelander WI 30.64 4.82 68.42 1.77 98.96 13.29
368 Paradise CA 30.34 5.91 36.54 17.8 100 35.2
369 Hazard KY 30.19 4.74 55.51 1.73 100 31.27
370 Greeneville TN 30 4.04 62.94 1.63 100 18.96
371 Meridian MS 29.9 3.15 68.4 0.41 100 12.7
372 El Centro CA 29.83 2.98 26.27 17.3 100 54.64
373 Alpena MI 29.76 3.65 62.28 1.42 100 19.52
374 Clarkesville GA 29.71 3.58 57.62 3.83 100 23.05
375 Selma AL 29.65 3.73 67.73 0.1 100 11.74
376 Duncan OK 29.4 4.97 64.77 2.38 100 9.16
377 Danville VA 29.1 3.41 59.54 5.54 100 13.19
378 Salt Lick KY 29.03 3.83 63.06 1.75 100 12.5
379 Park Rapids MN 28.49 2.41 55.67 1.16 98.63 25.41
380 Martinsville VA 28.3 1.36 62.96 1.34 100 12.59
381 Greenville MS 27.6 1.17 61.26 0.73 100 12.07
382 Fayette AL 26.91 2.55 57.12 0.4 100 12.6
383 Pine Bluff AR 26.71 4.18 54.55 0.97 98.39 12.99
384 Natchez MS 26.04 1.43 57.93 0.42 100 7.27
385 Mora MN 24.65 4.42 38.92 1.87 100 22.33
386 Storrs CT 18.5 0 17.72 0.52 100 26.26

A Closer Look at the Top 5 Cities

According to our results, the highest-ranked cities performed well due to high scores in labor force participation and digital connectivity. Several top cities also had close proximity to metropolises, including Washington, D.C., and New York City, allowing them to provide easy access to major tech hubs without passing the financial strain of living in one over to residents.

Best Small Cities for Tech Job Seekers

Survey Ranking Results
Rank #1 Rank #25

1. Silver Spring, Maryland

Silver Spring, MD, emerges as the top pick for tech job seekers in 2026. Bordering the nation’s capital, the city’s tech scene is heavily influenced by government contracting, biotech, health tech, and federal agencies, showing a wealth of opportunities for tech professionals.

Silver Spring’s active labor market is also reflected in its vibrant startup culture — thanks to the Silver Spring Innovation Center — and nearby concentrations of cybersecurity and software companies in major cities like Bethesda.

The city’s location makes it a prime destination for tech workers. Just outside of a major tech hub, Silver Spring gives professionals access to the economically strong D.C. metropolitan area without the big-city costs.

Key Stats:

  • Average annual pay: $90,000
  • Labor force participation rate: 78.7%
  • Digital connectivity score: 99.7
  • Quality of life score: 78

2. Morristown, New Jersey

Thirty miles west of Manhattan, Morristown, NJ, ranks second for tech professionals. The city’s close proximity to New York City allows residents to access the NYC job market easily via NJ Transit. Yet Morristown also offers enough cost-of-living separation for residents to feel fewer financial pressures.

The local economy isn’t solely dependent on New York City commuters, either. Morristown and the broader Morris County area are home to large IT companies and major pharma employers, including Novartis and Deloitte.

Morristown’s balanced environment, including solid pay and workforce stability, makes it an accessible location for tech workers to find and maintain employment.

Key Stats:

  • Average annual pay: $103,000
  • Labor force participation rate: 75.3%
  • Digital connectivity score: 100
  • Quality of life score: 81.2

3. Des Plaines, Illinois

A nearby suburb of Chicago, Des Plaines, IL, sits just 20 miles outside of a major tech hub that includes names such as Google Chicago, Salesforce, and Grubhub.

While the area is more business- and enterprise-focused than startup-driven, it’s not all big names or corporate types. Those seeking IT work in other fields can find it across telecom, software consulting, and managed IT services industries.

With an average annual salary of $87,500, Des Plaines’s housing and living costs are affordable in relation to earnings, giving tech professionals room to grow financially.

Key Stats:

  • Average annual pay: $87,500
  • Labor force participation rate: 65.3%
  • Digital connectivity score: 100
  • Quality of life score: 53.47

4. Charlottesville, Virginia

For a city with a population of just 45,000, Charlottesville, VA, has a highly active tech ecosystem. Ranking fourth overall, the city has ties to biotech, defense tech, software consulting, and a wealth of University of Virginia research programs.

The city also stands out for its favorable environmental conditions. Located near the Blue Ridge Mountains, the city’s surrounding natural landscape reflects its high quality of life and walkability scores. Reasonable living costs also reinforce its position, making it an accessible location for tech professionals to reside.

Though it may have a smaller market than its neighbors in the D.C. metro area, Charlottesville offers a strong tech hub with plenty of options to choose from, including a rich startup ecosystem (connected to UVA) and established companies.

Key Stats:

  • Average annual pay: $72,300
  • Labor force participation rate: 64.6%
  • Digital connectivity score: 100
  • Quality of life score: 82.4

5. Longmont, Colorado

Longmont, CO, rounds out the top five with strong earning potential and an innovative tech landscape. Outside Denver and Boulder, Longmont boasts one of Colorado’s more tech-forward communities. The city is known for its focus on aerospace systems, hardware engineering, and embedded software, supplying jobs for thousands of tech workers.

Longmont’s average annual salary of $100,000 and favorable housing costs also support its overall livability and appeal. Longmont’s combination of strong income levels, reliable internet, and living conditions makes it an attractive city for tech professionals seeking work.

Key Stats:

  • Average annual pay: $100,000
  • Labor force participation rate: 68.7%
  • Digital connectivity score: 99.9
  • Quality of life score: 60.7

Summary

While national headlines may point to the tech job market being in constant flux, opportunities for IT work are expanding. Tech workers willing to relocate for work may find that smaller, under-the-radar cities could have what they’re looking for, including solid pay, affordable housing, and immediate job access.

The top small cities for IT job seekers are those that stand out for their highly active labor markets and consistently strong internet infrastructure, creating environments where professionals can find and maintain long-term employment.

For media inquiries, please reach out to dennis@hostingadvice.com.

Methodology

The methodology below explains the data inputs, scoring approach, and weighted metric framework used for this ranking. This ranking was generated in April 2026, using a weighted composite scoring model.

Overview

This study ranks 386 cities based on their suitability for tech job seekers, focusing on economic opportunities, job market dynamics, cost of living, digital connectivity, and quality of life. Each category is weighted to reflect its importance in attracting tech talent, with metrics sourced from reputable organizations.

Data & Sources

Data was collected from various sources, including the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau, Numbeo, FCC Broadband Data, CDC PLACES, and Walk Score. The study employs a penalization approach for missing data to ensure a robust ranking.

Scoring Approach

Each section contributes a specific number of points to the overall score, with metrics weighted according to their relevance. Higher scores indicate better conditions for tech job seekers, with metrics transformed to reflect desirable outcomes.

Caveats

No state fallbacks were utilized in this study, ensuring that all metrics reflect direct city data. However, the penalization for missing data may affect the scores of some cities, particularly in metrics where data was less comprehensive.

Economic Opportunities — Total Points: 25

This section contributes 25 points to the total score and captures one dimension of city performance. Its 2 metrics are combined using metric-level weights, then rolled into the composite score according to the section point allocation.

1. GDP Per Capita — Single Weight

GDP Per Capita measures the economic output per person, providing insight into the economic health and productivity of a city. This metric is crucial for understanding the economic opportunities available to tech job seekers, as higher GDP per capita often correlates with better job prospects and higher wages. The interpretation of this metric is straightforward; a higher value indicates a more prosperous economy, which is attractive to potential job seekers in the tech industry.

2. Average Annual Pay— Single Weight

Average Annual Pay reflects the typical earnings across all industries within a city, serving as a key indicator of economic vitality and job quality. For tech job seekers, this metric is particularly relevant as it highlights the financial rewards associated with employment in the area. A higher average pay suggests a competitive job market, which can attract talent. The interpretation remains clear; higher values indicate better compensation, enhancing the city’s appeal to prospective tech employees.

Job Market Dynamics — Total Points: 25

This section contributes 25 points to the total score and captures one dimension of city performance. Its 2 metrics are combined using metric-level weights, then rolled into the composite score according to the section point allocation.

1. Unemployment Rate — Double Weight

The Unemployment Rate measures the percentage of the labor force that is actively seeking work but unable to find employment. This metric is vital for assessing the job market’s health, particularly for tech job seekers who are sensitive to employment conditions. A lower unemployment rate indicates a more robust job market, suggesting greater opportunities for job seekers. The interpretation is direct; lower values are favorable, indicating a more competitive environment for job seekers in the tech sector.

2. Labor Force Participation Rate — Double Weight

The Labor Force Participation Rate indicates the percentage of the population aged 16 and older that is either employed or actively seeking work. This metric is significant for understanding the availability of talent in the tech job market, as a higher participation rate suggests a more engaged workforce. For tech job seekers, a higher rate can indicate a larger pool of potential colleagues and competitors. The interpretation is straightforward; higher values are preferable, reflecting a dynamic labor market conducive to job seekers.

Cost of Living — Total Points: 25

This section contributes 25 points to the total score and captures one dimension of city performance. Its 3 metrics are combined using metric-level weights, then rolled into the composite score according to the section point allocation.

1. Regional Price Parity (Housing) — Triple Weight

Regional Price Parity (Housing) measures the relative cost of housing rents compared to the national average, with lower values indicating more affordable housing. This metric is particularly relevant for tech job seekers who must consider living expenses when evaluating job opportunities. A lower housing cost can enhance the attractiveness of a city, making it easier for job seekers to afford living there. The interpretation is straightforward; lower values are favorable, indicating a more affordable housing market.

2. Median Household Income — Single Weight

Median Household Income measures the middle income level of households in a city, adjusted for inflation. This metric is essential for tech job seekers as it provides insight into the economic environment and living standards they can expect. A higher median income indicates better financial conditions, which can influence relocation decisions for job seekers. The interpretation is clear; higher values suggest a more favorable economic climate for potential residents, making the city more attractive to tech talent.

3. Groceries Index — Single Weight

The Groceries Index measures the relative cost of groceries in a city. A lower index indicates more affordable living conditions, which is important for job seekers evaluating their overall expenses.

Quality of Life — Total Points: 15

This section contributes 15 points to the total score and captures one dimension of city performance. Its 5 metrics are combined using metric-level weights, then rolled into the composite score according to the section point allocation.

1. Traffic Index — Single Weight

The Traffic Index measures congestion levels in a city. Lower traffic congestion improves commute times and overall quality of life, making a city more appealing to tech workers.

2. Fair/Poor Health Status — Single Weight

The Fair/Poor Health Status metric reflects the percentage of adults who self-rate their health as fair or poor. This metric is important for tech job seekers as it provides insight into the overall health and well-being of the population, which can affect work-life balance and productivity. A lower percentage indicates better health outcomes, contributing to a higher quality of life. The interpretation is straightforward; lower values are favorable, suggesting a healthier environment for potential residents.

3. Level of Crime — Single Weight

The Level of Crime metric assesses the perceived safety of a city based on crime rates. This metric is particularly relevant for tech job seekers who prioritize safety when considering relocation. A lower crime level indicates a safer environment, which can enhance the overall quality of life and attract talent. The interpretation is clear; lower values are preferable, reflecting a more secure living situation for potential residents.

4. Walk Score — Single Weight

The Walk Score measures walkability, indicating how friendly a city is to pedestrians. Higher walkability can enhance quality of life, making cities more attractive to tech job seekers.

5. Air Quality Score — Single Weight

The Air Quality Score measures the perceived quality of air in a city, which is an important factor for health-conscious tech job seekers. Good air quality can significantly impact quality of life and overall well-being, making it a key consideration for those looking to relocate. A higher score indicates better air quality, which can enhance the attractiveness of a city. The interpretation is straightforward; higher values are favorable, suggesting a healthier environment for potential residents.

Digital Connectivity — Total Points: 10

This section contributes 10 points to the total score and captures one dimension of city performance. Its 1 metric is combined using metric-level weights, then rolled into the composite score according to the section point allocation.

1. High Speed Coverage Rate — Triple Weight

The High-Speed Coverage Rate measures the percentage of serviceable locations in a county that have access to high-speed broadband. This metric is crucial for tech job seekers, as reliable internet access is essential for many tech jobs and remote work opportunities. A higher coverage rate indicates better connectivity, which can enhance productivity and job satisfaction. The interpretation is clear; higher values are preferable, reflecting a more connected environment for tech professionals.

About the Author

Lynn Cadet
Lynn Cadet
Contributing Expert

Lynn Cadet is a seasoned technology writer with extensive experience covering web hosting, software platforms, and IT infrastructure. At HostingAdvice.com, she has authored more than 300 articles analyzing everything from server architecture and cloud performance to cybersecurity, SaaS innovations, and developer-driven tools. She also conducts hands-on testing of web hosts, evaluating performance, usability, and reliability, to produce thorough, data-driven reviews. A graduate of the University of Florida, Lynn’s reporting and editorial work can also be found across multiple online publications.

View Lynn Cadet's Full Profile »

Other Studies You May Enjoy

The Best and Worst 5 Small Cities for Internet Access and Affordability in 2026

The Best and Worst Small Cities for Internet Access and Affordability in 2026

By: Lynn Cadet
The Best and Worst 5 Small U.S. Cities for Remote Workers

Best and Worst Small U.S. Cities for Remote Workers

By: Lynn Cadet
Forget Student Loans: Kenzie Academy Provides Job-Ready Tech Education in Half the Time with No Upfront Tuition

Kenzie Academy: Job-Ready Tech Education with No Upfront Tuition

By: Christine Preusler
The Best and Worst States for Launching an Online Business

Best and Worst States for Launching an Online Business

By: Lynn Cadet
The 20 Most (and Least) Tech-Savvy Cities in America

The 20 Most (and Least) Tech-Savvy Cities in America

By: Laura Bernheim
What Is a Cron Job? How Cron Jobs Keep Your Systems Running Smoothly

How Cron Jobs Keep Your Systems Running Smoothly

By: Surajdeep Singh