Can AI Build Your Site in 90 Seconds? The Easy Ones, Yes.

A yoga instructor types some phrases into a box: “calming location, class schedule, soft color palette and method of booking.” Eighty-six seconds later, a complete website with an actual layout, easily editable placeholder text, royalty-free images from a stock library, and a basic site map is created. With a few additional refinements, it goes live.

This is a demonstration of the Squarespace AI Designer, a tool that was made available on June 3. It generates a complete website template based on a description of your industry, desired aesthetic and types of pages required. Within about 90 seconds, it provides an editable, fully functional website for 80% of requests.

Internally, the system incorporates a version of Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 large language model specifically adapted for use with Squarespace.

The resulting tool is primarily directed toward the do-it-yourself market and is appropriate for clients paying less than $200 per month. This reinforces the company’s emphasis during its Q2 meeting with investors.

The reaction within the Webflow community was swift and, in some cases, dramatic. One widely shared post asked, “Is this the end of Webflow freelance?” The answer is clearly no. That conclusion was based on a single launch demo rather than the broader reality of the product.

More complex projects produced far more nuanced results and required significant effort to complete. One Webflow partner, for example, documented an extensive test involving 14 separate prompts, highlighting the tool’s strengths and its limitations.

Results for the simplest applications were impressive. The yoga instructor site was developed in 86 seconds and required only minimal editing to achieve an acceptable appearance. Pages for single-page portfolios, simple service enterprises, and landing pages were completed rapidly and with excellent results.

For more complex applications, results were more mixed. Development of a B2B SaaS site with pages for product pricing, a blog and a large collection of customer logos required 124 seconds and produced acceptable results for all components except the final collection of case histories delivered by a complete content management system.

The resulting site appeared finished but was not actually complete. The tool is excellent for landing pages and simple service sites, mediocre for multipage builds with custom CMS, weak on integrations, and virtually useless for membership sites, for e-commerce with custom logic or for any application requiring API access.

In the end, it isn't that "AI now builds websites." Rather, it builds the easy 80% of websites and leaves the difficult 20% to those who actually receive compensation for this work.

This is most important for developers at the lower end of the market. A project previously completed in an afternoon is now available to the client at the cost of a Squarespace subscription and in the time required to read this paragraph.

The remaining work — custom systems and requirements for extensive integration and complete reliance on API technology — are totally beyond the capabilities of the tool. AI can't compete in these areas.

For freelance developers, the real question isn't whether AI will replace them. It's whether they want to compete with a tool that can produce acceptable results in 90 seconds or focus on the complex, strategic work that AI still can't do on its own.

The Webflow test partner reached a similar conclusion. The launch, the partner wrote, was "a positioning challenge, not an existential threat." Squarespace's entry into a highly competitive market was not at all surprising.

On Jan. 21, Wix introduced its own system for generating code based on natural-language prompts and providing complete capabilities for drag-and-drop editing. On the same day that Squarespace's product became available, Wix was named a partner for the release of its system with the Codex Enterprise technology of OpenAI.

Developers can now request code from the Codex system, select Wix as the final production system, and deliver an operational site with complete capabilities for billing, scheduling, and use of a CRM system.

This represents three major developments in AI-based site construction within five months. It's no longer a trend of technological development, but represents instead the emergence of a single category of default technology.

AI has fundamentally changed the DIY website-building experience. Instead of scrolling through template libraries, users are now presented with a first draft of a website generated automatically by AI. For complex Webflow or WordPress projects, that development is reassuring — but not without caveats.

The AI-powered designer experience is now available at the do-it-yourself level and doesn't yet threaten the integrated, branded work that fills agency invoices. The protection afforded by the hardest 20% of the work remains intact.

The caveat reflects the continuing pace of change. A solo practitioner choosing a tool for a yoga studio or portfolio had no credible response within 90 seconds six months ago. Today, there are at least three choices, and the companies developing them are optimizing state-of-the-art models for this purpose.

Automation of the low end of the market is complete for this quarter, and the important question for all builders is to what extent automation extends up the curve of complexity for the next implementation.